Imagine There's No Heaven: How Atheism Helped Create the Modern World

By Mitchell Stephens

The historic achievements of non secular trust were huge and good chronicled. yet what approximately the accomplishments of these who've challenged faith? touring from classical Greece to twenty-first century America, think there isn't any Heaven explores the position of disbelief in shaping Western civilization. At each one juncture universal subject matters emerge: through wondering the position of gods within the heavens or the function of a God in growing guy in the world, nonbelievers support flow technology ahead. by means of hard the divine correct of monarchs and the strictures of holy books, nonbelievers, together with Jean- Jacques Rousseau and Denis Diderot, support extend human liberties, and impact the early founding of the United States. Revolutions in technological know-how, in politics, in philosophy, in artwork, and in psychology were led, on a number of events, by means of those people who are freed from the limitations of non secular lifestyles. Mitchell Stephens tells the often-courageous stories of history's most vital atheists― like Denis Diderot and Salman Rushdie. Stephens makes a robust and unique case for his or her value not just to brand new New Atheist move yet to the way in which a lot of us―believers and nonbelievers―now imagine and dwell.

Show description

Preview of Imagine There's No Heaven: How Atheism Helped Create the Modern World PDF

Similar Religion books

God's Secretaries: The Making of the King James Bible

A community of advanced currents flowed throughout Jacobean England. This used to be the britain of Shakespeare, Jonson, and Bacon; the period of the Gunpowder Plot and the worst outbreak of the plague. Jacobean England used to be either extra godly and no more godly than the rustic had ever been, and the complete tradition was once drawn taut among those polarities.

Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

In Did Jesus Exist? historian and Bible professional Bart Ehrman confronts the query, "Did Jesus exist in any respect? " Ehrman vigorously defends the historic Jesus, identifies the main traditionally trustworthy assets for top knowing Jesus’ venture and message, and provides a compelling portrait of the individual on the middle of the Christian culture.

Between Eden and Armageddon: The Future of World Religions, Violence, and Peacemaking

Contemporary years have noticeable a meteoric upward push within the strength and significance of geared up faith in lots of elements of the area. even as, there was an important bring up in violence perpetrated within the identify of faith. whereas a lot has been written at the courting among violence and non secular militancy, historical past indicates that non secular humans have additionally performed a severe position in peacemaking inside of a number of cultures.

A Sociology of Religious Emotion

This well timed e-book goals to alter the best way we expect approximately faith by means of placing emotion again onto the time table. It demanding situations an inclination to over-emphasise rational points of faith, and rehabilitates its embodied, visceral and affective dimensions. opposed to the view that non secular emotion is a in basic terms deepest topic, it bargains a brand new framework which exhibits how spiritual feelings come up within the assorted interactions among human brokers and spiritual groups, human brokers and gadgets of devotion, and groups and sacred symbols.

Extra resources for Imagine There's No Heaven: How Atheism Helped Create the Modern World

Show sample text content

And, for the main half, those societies inspired wondering and have been respectful of studying. So, the truth that it remained attainable to have “met an excellent many” nonbelievers during this a part of the realm in those centuries shouldn't be excellent. what's astounding is the abruptness and completeness with which this line of nonbelievers ends—when a faith that used to be specific, that used to be obsessed through spiritual sincerity and that didn't placed a lot inventory in wondering and nonreligious studying all started gaining strength within the West. we will leap, during this line of recognized nonbelievers, from Anaxagoras, Thucydides and all of the (presumably younger) contributors in Athens who, in response to Plato, have been confident that “gods don't exist,” to Epicurus—born into an Athenian relations residing outdoors of Athens presently sooner than Plato died. Epicurus’ identify may develop into and has remained synonymous with a number of disbelief. For Epicurus was once an anacreontic, even supposing much less a proponent of physically pleasures (i. e. , reliable nutrition) than modern use of the time period epicurean may recommend. And Epicurus insisted that we must always cease bothering ourselves approximately gods. He did, even though, have one weak point as a hyperlink in a sequence of nonbelievers: Epicurus stated he believed gods existed. yet he proposal these gods have totally no real interest in or influence upon human existence. in order that they could in addition haven't existed. nonetheless, if we'd like a extra orthodox nonbeliever for our line, now we have Epicurus’ modern, Theodorus, who used to be probably—once back the studies are sketchy—prosecuted for impiety in Athens. three Theodorus used to be linked to the Cyrenaics, a staunchly anacreontic institution of philosophy. The Cyrenaics, based through certainly one of Socrates’ much less sanctimonious disciples, have been proponents of physically pleasures. four the easiest proof that Theodorus himself was once a nonbeliever—and hence that disbelief remained an element in Athens—was the identify during which he grew to become recognized: Theodorus the Atheist. Carneades, subsequent during this line, used to be born a couple of dozen years after Theodorus died. by means of the second one century BCE we discover this Skeptic, probably history’s maximum Skeptic, heading the Academy that Plato had based in Athens. Carneades, an “Academic” Skeptic, used to be wanting to problem claims concerning the nature of things—dogmatic claims, idealistic claims, kind of all claims, his personal frequently integrated. even if Carneades by no means proclaimed himself an atheist (he wasn’t within the behavior of proclaiming himself anything), faith used to be between his basic objectives. The attack Carneades fixed on claims in regards to the gods starts off with what's referred to as the consensus gentium (or “agreement of the people”) argument: how may perhaps all of humankind be improper in considering there are gods? Carneades solutions in 3 ways, as defined through Cicero: First, he demanding situations the life of this type of consensus through pointing to obvious nonbelievers, between them Diagoras. moment, Carneades observes that the truth that such a lot of people think doesn't turn out that their trust has “reasons,” in simple terms that it has “causes” (which Xenophanes and Critias had started investigating).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.14 of 5 – based on 29 votes