Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books))

By Alex Callinicos

Making heritage is set the query - crucial to social idea - of ways human brokers draw their powers from the social buildings they're interested by. Drawing on classical Marxism, analytical philosophy, and quite a lot of ancient writing, Alex Callinicos seeks to prevent unacceptable extremes: dissolving the topic into an impersonal flux, as poststructuralists are inclined to; and treating social buildings because the mere results of person motion (for instance, rational-choice theory). between these mentioned are Althusser, Anderson, Benjamin, Brenner, Cohen, Elster, Foucault, Giddens, Habermas, and Mann. Callinicos has written a longer advent to this new version that reports advancements because Making historical past used to be first released in 1987. This republication provides a brand new iteration of readers entry to a huge intervention in Marxism and social theory.
Alex Callinicos, D.Phil. (1979) in Philosophy, collage of Oxford, is Professor of Politics on the college of York (UK). He has written commonly approximately Marxism and social conception. His most modern books are Social conception (1999), Equality (2000), opposed to the 3rd method (2001) and An Anti-Capitalist Manifesto (2003), all released through Polity.

Show description

Quick preview of Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books)) PDF

Best Political Theory books

The Rehnquist Court and the Constitution

Within the Rehnquist courtroom and the structure, Tinsley Yarbrough offers a complete examine cutting-edge splendid courtroom Justices and their record--a learn all of the extra priceless for the Court's combined judgements and hard-to-categorize path. An finished biographer, Yarbrough deals incisive graphics of the 9 who now take a seat at the excessive bench, and tellingly experiences their nomination hearings.

Just Marriage (New Democracy Forum)

From the floor breaking felony judgements on homosexual marriage to the merchandising of marriage for low-income households, the "sacred establishment" of marriage has changed into a public battleground. Who will be allowed to marry and is marriage a public or deepest act? should still marriage be deserted thoroughly? Or may still marriage be redefined as a civil establishment that promotes sexual and racial equality?

The Multiculturalism of Fear

This important new liberal account of multiculturalism combines an research of the coverage dilemmas confronted by means of multiethnic states around the globe with a philosophical attention of multiculturalism and nationalism. Jacob T. Levy boldly argues that liberalism shouldn't be centrally all in favour of both holding or transcending cultural groups, practices, and identities.

Rousseau's Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition

This ebook is the 1st entire learn of Rousseau's wealthy and complicated concept of the kind of self-love (amour propre ) that, for him, marks the relevant distinction among people and the beasts. Amour propre is the eagerness that drives human contributors to hunt the esteem, approval, admiration, or love--the popularity --of their fellow beings.

Extra info for Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books))

Show sample text content

Social kinfolk in our personal in addition to different species contain rank, Midgley claims, in view that they're a generalisation of the relation among guardian and baby. hence: ‘Our traditional curiosity in dominance isn't a lust for oppression. it's a flavor for order, one who can get out of hand. in keeping with the relation of kid to mother or father, it truly is basically protective’. sixty one to prevent such canonisations of social oppression, Geras, in his extraordinary try and display Marxism’s dependence on a thought of human nature, means that we distinguish among ‘human nature’, ‘a consistent entity, the set of all (relatively) everlasting human characteristics’, and the ‘nature of man’, ‘the all-round personality of people in a few given context. while the first utilization makes of human nature whatever unchanging through definition . . . the second one leaves open the measure of mutability within the nature of man’. sixty two the sort of contrast eliminates a conventional Marxist objection to the thought of human nature, specifically that kinds of behaviour coming up inside of specific social kin (say, egoism and competitiveness less than capitalism) are handled as ‘permanent fifty nine 60 sixty one sixty two N. Geras, Marx and Human Nature (London, 1983), p. ninety seven. D. Wiggins, Sameness and Substance (Oxford, 1980), p. 188. M. Midgeley, Beast and guy (London, 1978), pp. fifty eight, 331. Geras, Marx, p. 24. matters and brokers • 23 human characteristics’. Geras’s utilization permits us to treat those as features relatively of the ‘nature of guy’ lower than capitalism. What, then, should be acknowledged concerning the really ‘permanent features’ constituting human nature? within the first position, they contain not only the ‘range of powers and traits’ said via Midgley, but in addition yes certain wishes. This aspect should be under pressure within the mild of ways within which subjectivity is usually conceived as anything airy, non-bodily, even by way of these dedicated to realizing humans as traditionally located brokers. hence Agnes Heller rightly items to Habermas’s concept of communicative motion simply because ‘the creature-like points of people are lacking. . . . Habermasian guy . . . has no physique, no emotions; the “structure of character” is identified with cognition, language and interaction’. sixty three very important notwithstanding the questions of the physique and of human wishes are for an account of business enterprise, I shall, notwithstanding, now not take care of them the following. sixty four Human nature, in fact, is composed in capacities in addition to wishes. An account of those capacities is valuable to Marx’s philosophical anthropology, built chiefly within the fiscal and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology. Elster summarises this conception of human nature hence: ‘Marx distinguishes males from different animals at the foundation of (i) self-consciousness, (ii) intentionality, (iii) language, (iv) tool-using, (v) tool-making and (vi) cooperation’. sixty five Marx, in truth, varies his pressure on those varied positive factors. therefore he writes within the Manuscripts: The animal is straight away one with its life-activity. It doesn't distinguish itself from it. it's its life-activity.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.95 of 5 – based on 41 votes