SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance

By Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner

Freakonomics lived at the New York instances bestseller record for an magnificent years. Now authors Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner go back with extra iconoclastic insights and observations in SuperFreakonomics—the lengthy awaited follow-up to their New York instances Notable blockbuster. Based on innovative learn and unique stories SuperFreakonomics promises to once more problem our view of ways the area really works.

Show description

Quick preview of SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance PDF

Similar Economics books

The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves (P.S.)

“Ridley writes with panache, wit, and humor and monitors impressive ingenuity to find how one can current advanced fabrics for the lay reader. ” — la occasions In a daring and provocative interpretation of monetary historical past, Matt Ridley, the recent York Times-bestselling writer of Genome and The crimson Queen, makes the case for an economics of wish, arguing that the advantages of trade, know-how, innovation, and change—what Ridley calls cultural evolution—will unavoidably bring up human prosperity.

Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness

For lovers of Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink and Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking quickly and gradual, a revelatory new examine how we make decisions More than 750,000 copies sold A New York Times bestsellerAn Economist Best e-book of the YearA Financial Times Best e-book of the YearNudge is set choices—how we cause them to and the way we will be able to make higher ones.

A Brief History of Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism--the doctrine that industry trade is an ethic in itself, in a position to appearing as a consultant for all human action--has develop into dominant in either proposal and perform all through a lot of the realm due to the fact that 1970 or so. Writing for a large viewers, David Harvey, writer of the hot Imperialism and The of Postmodernity, the following tells the political-economic tale of the place neoliberalization got here from and the way it proliferated at the global level.

What I Learned Losing a Million Dollars (Columbia Business School Publishing)

Jim Paul's meteoric upward thrust took him from a small city in Northern Kentucky to governor of the Chicago Mercantile trade, but he misplaced it all―his fortune, his popularity, and his job―in one deadly assault of over the top financial hubris. during this sincere, frank research, Paul and Brendan Moynihan revisit the occasions that resulted in Paul's disastrous selection and look at the mental components at the back of undesirable monetary practices in numerous monetary sectors.

Additional info for SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance

Show sample text content

We had the nice fortune to fulfill Ian Horsley at approximately this time and, together, we started to ask yourself: if his algorithms may sift via an never-ending flow of retail banking information and effectively become aware of fraudsters, may possibly an identical info be coaxed to spot different undesirable men, like would-be terrorists? This droop used to be supported by means of the knowledge path from the September eleven assaults. The banking histories of these nineteen terrorists printed a few behaviors that, within the combination, exceptional them from the common financial institution patron: They opened their U. S. debts with funds or funds equivalents, within the typical quantity of approximately $4,000, frequently at a department of a giant, recognized financial institution. they often used a P. O. field as an deal with, and the addresses replaced usually. a few of them frequently despatched and bought cord transfers to and from different international locations, yet those transactions have been consistently under the restrict that brought on the bank’s reporting requisites. They tended to make one huge deposit after which withdraw profit small quantities through the years. Their banking didn’t mirror common residing bills like hire, utilities, car funds, assurance, etc. there has been no standard per 30 days consistency within the timing in their deposits or withdrawals. They didn’t use mark downs bills or safe-deposit containers. The ratio of money withdrawals to exams written used to be surprisingly excessive. it really is evidently more uncomplicated to retroactively create a banking profile of a confirmed terrorist than to construct one who could determine a terrorist ahead of he acts. Nor could a profile of those nineteen men—foreign nationals dwelling within the usa who have been education to hijack jetliners—necessarily healthy the profile of, say, a homegrown suicide bomber in London. in addition, whilst information were utilized in the prior to spot wrongdoing—like the dishonest schoolteachers and collusive sumo wrestlers we wrote approximately in Freakonomics—there used to be a comparatively excessive incidence of fraud between a precise inhabitants. yet therefore, the inhabitants was once significant (Horsley’s financial institution on my own had many hundreds of thousands of shoppers) whereas the variety of power terrorists used to be very small. Let’s say, in spite of the fact that, you may strengthen a banking set of rules that was once ninety nine percentage exact. We’ll imagine the uk has 500 terrorists. The set of rules could safely establish 495 of them, or ninety nine percentage. yet there are approximately 50 million adults within the uk who've not anything to do with terrorism, and the set of rules could additionally wrongly determine 1 percentage of them, or 500,000 humans. on the finish of the day, this glorious, 99-percent-accurate set of rules spits out too many fake positives—half one million those who will be rightly offended after they have been hauled in via the specialists on suspicion of terrorism. Nor, after all, might the experts deal with the workload. this can be a universal challenge in overall healthiness care. A evaluate of a contemporary cancer-screening trial confirmed that fifty percentage of the 68,000 individuals bought at the very least 1 false-positive consequence after present process 14 exams. So even supposing health-care advocates might urge common screening for all types of maladies, the truth is that the process will be beaten via fake positives and the ill will be crowded out.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.94 of 5 – based on 16 votes